[Lista ArNOG] Problemas de flash renumbering en IPv6 (Fwd: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum-10 (Ends 2025-09-26))

[Fernando Gont]

Estimad*s,

Comenzo el WGLC (Working Group Last Call) de uno de nuestros drafts de 
IETF.

Este doc apunta a mejorar la situacion actual en esta materia. creo que 
es un paso enorme en la direccion correcta (por algun lugar se empieza).

* El llamado esta aqui: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/hdw9xtL-GUGRCrNsDrCauM9gTs4/
* El doc aqui: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum/
* Y una buena cancion sobre el Diego aqui: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9rILjy1WK4&list=RDo9rILjy1WK4.  (la 
letra esta aun mejor que la musica)


Dime si amas al Diego, y te dire quien eres....
Fer




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum-10 (Ends 2025-09-26)
Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-From: alias-bounces en ietf.org
Resent-To: fgont en si6networks.com, furry13 en gmail.com, jan en 6connect.com, 
richard.patterson en sky.uk
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:14:41 -0700
From: Bob Hinden via Datatracker <noreply en ietf.org>
Reply-To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden en gmail.com>
To: 6man-chairs en ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum en ietf.org, 
ipv6 en ietf.org


Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum-10 (Ends 2025-09-26)

This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document.

Abstract:
    In scenarios where network configuration information becomes invalid
    without explicit notification to the local network, local hosts may
    end up employing stale information for an unacceptably long period of
    time, thus resulting in interoperability problems.  This document
    improves the reaction of IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration to
    such configuration changes.  It formally updates RFC 4191, RFC 4861,
    RFC 4862, and RFC 8106.

File can be retrieved from:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-slaac-renum/

Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
publication of this document by replying to this email keeping ipv6 en ietf.org
in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are
highly appreciated.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in 
BCP 79
[1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
be found at [3].

Thank you.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/




-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont en si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494